Recruitment of plasma cells to the bone marrow in primary and secondary immune reactions (preprint)

Bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) emerge as a consequence of immune reactions and are considered the source of antibodies that protect against recurrent infectious diseases throughout life. Despite their importance, it remains unclear if these cells reflect different activation environments or the differentiation/maturation stages of their precursors. Here we track the recruitment of plasma cells, generated in primary and secondary immune reactions to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccines, to the human bone marrow. Trajectories based on single cell transcriptomes and antigen-receptor clonotypes of antibody-secreting cells exiting the immune reaction and of those residing in the bone marrow, allow to follow the evolution of the immune response to these vaccines, leading to sequential colonization of these cells to different compartments (clans) of BMPC, and their establishment as long-lived (memory) plasma cells. In primary immune reactions, both CD19low (clans 1 and 4) and CD19high (clan 0) BMPC are generated. In secondary immune reactions, mostly CD19high BMPC of the largest compartment (clan 0) are generated, resulting from the reactivation of memory B lymphocytes. The latter is also observed in vaccinated convalescent individuals and upon recall vaccination against diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis (DTP). Thus, humoral immunological memory, i.e. serum antibodies secreted by long-lived memory BMPC, is generated already in the primary immune response, more so in the secondary, and it represents the evolution of the immune response.

Three-month follow-up of heterologous vs homologous third vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (preprint)

Importance Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is severely reduced. Heterologous 3rd vaccination combining mRNA and vector vaccines did not increase seroconversion at four weeks after vaccination but evolution of antibody levels beyond the first month remain unknown. Objective To assess changes in antibody response following a 3rd vaccination with mRNA or vector vaccine in KTR from month one to month three after vaccination. Design, Setting and Participants Three-month follow-up (pre-specified secondary endpoint) of a single-center, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, controlled trial on 3rd vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in 201 KTR who did not develop SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies following two doses of an mRNA vaccine. Intervention(s) mRNA (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) or vector (Ad26COVS1) as third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcome was seroconversion at the second follow-up between 60-120 days after the 3rd vaccination. Subsequently, higher cut-off levels associated with neutralizing capacity and protective immunity were applied (i.e. >15, >100, >141 and >264 BAU/mL). In addition, trajectories of antibody levels from month one to month three were analyzed. Finally, SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4 and CD8 T-cells at four weeks were compared among the 18 top responders in both groups. Results A total of 169 patients were available for the three-month follow-up. Overall, seroconversion at three months was similar between both groups (45% versus 50% for mRNA and vector group, respectively; OR=1.24, 95%CI=[0.65, 2.37], p=0.539). However, when applying higher cut-off levels, a significantly larger number of individual in the vector group reached antibody levels > 141 and > 264 BAU/mL at the three-month follow-up (141 BAU/mL: 4% vs. 15% OR=4.96, 95%CI=[1.29, 28.21], p=0.009 and 264 BAU/mL: 1% vs. 10% OR=8.75, 95%CI=[1.13, 396.17], p=0.018 for mRNA vs. vector vaccine group, respectively). In line, antibody levels in seroconverted patients further increased from month one to month three in the vector group while remaining unchanged in the mRNA group (median increase: mRNA= 1.35 U/mL and vector = 27.6 U/mL, p = 0.004). Of particular note, there was no difference in the CD4 and CD8 T-cell response between the mRNA and vector vaccine group at month one. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite a similar overall seroconversion rate at three months following third vaccination in KTR, a heterologous third booster vaccination with Ad26COVS1 resulted in significantly higher antibody levels in responders. Trial Registration: EurdraCT: 2021-002927-39

Temporary hold of mycophenolate boosts SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-specific humoral and cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients (preprint)

Transplant recipients exhibit an impaired protective immunity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, potentially caused by mycophenolate (MPA) immunosuppression. Recent data from autoimmune patients suggest that temporary MPA hold might significantly improve booster vaccination outcomes. We applied a fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during temporary (5 weeks) MPA hold to 29 kidney transplant recipients, who had not mounted a humoral immune-response to previous vaccinations. Seroconversion until day 32 after vaccination was observed in 76% of patients, associated with acquisition of virus neutralizing capacity. Interestingly, 21/25 (84%) CNI-treated patients responded, but only 1/4 Belatacept-treated patients. In line with humoral responses, counts and relative frequencies of spike receptor binding domain (RBD) specific B cells were significantly increased on day 7 after vaccination, with an increase in RBD specific CD27++CD38+ plasmablasts. Whereas overall proportions of spike-reactive CD4+ T cells remained unaltered after the fourth dose, frequencies were positively correlated with specific IgG levels. Importantly, antigen-specific proliferating Ki67+ and in vivo activated PD1+ T cells significantly increased after re-vaccination during MPA hold, whereas cytokine production and memory differentiation remained unaffected. In summary, MPA hold was safe and augmented all arms of immunity during booster vaccination, suggesting its implementation in vaccination protocols for clinically stable transplant recipients.

Altered increase in STAT1 expression and phosphorylation in severe COVID-19 (preprint)

The interferon pathway represents a key antiviral defense mechanism and is being considered as a therapeutic target in COVID-19. Both, substitution of interferon and blocking interferon signaling through JAK STAT inhibition to limit cytokine storms have been proposed. However, little is known so far about possible abnormalities in STAT signaling in immune cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the current study, we investigated downstream targets of interferon signaling, including STAT1, pSTAT1 and 2 and IRF1, 7 and 9 by flow cytometry in 30 patients with COVID-19, 17 with mild and 13 with severe infection. We report an upregulation of STAT1 and IRF9 in mild and severe COVID-19 cases, which correlated with the IFN-signature assessed by Siglec-1 (CD169) expression on peripheral monocytes. Most interestingly, Siglec-1 and STAT1 in CD14+ monocytes and plasmablasts showed lower expression among severe COVID-19 cases compared to mild cases. Contrary to the baseline whole protein STAT1 expression, the phosphorylation of STAT1 was enhanced in severe COVID-19 cases, indicating a dysbalanced JAK STAT signaling that fails to induce transcription of interferon stimulated response elements (ISRE). This abnormality persisted after IFN- and IFN-{gamma} stimulation of PBMCs from patients with severe COVID-19. The data suggest impaired STAT1 transcriptional upregulation among severely infected patients which may represent a potential predictive biomarker and may allow stratification of patients for certain interferon-pathway targeted treatments.

B and T cell responses after a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients (preprint)

BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that solid organ transplant recipients, as opposed to the general population, show strongly impaired responsiveness towards standard SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccination, demanding alternative strategies for protection of this vulnerable group. MethodsIn line with recent recommendations, a third dose of either heterologous ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) or homologous BNT162b2 (BioNTech) was administered to 25 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) without humoral response after 2 doses of BNT162b2, followed by analysis of serological responses and vaccine-specific B- and T-cell immunity. Results9/25 (36%) KTR under standard immunosuppressive treatment seroconverted until day 27 after the third vaccination, while one patient developed severe COVID-19 infection immediately after vaccination. Cellular analysis seven days after the third dose showed significantly elevated frequencies of viral spike protein receptor binding domain specific B cells in humoral responders as compared to non-responders. Likewise, portions of spike-reactive CD4+ T helper cells were significantly elevated in seroconverting patients. Furthermore, overall frequencies of IL-2+, IL-4+ and polyfunctional CD4+ T cells significantly increased after the third dose, whereas memory/effector differentiation remained unaffected. ConclusionsOur data suggest that a fraction of transplant recipients benefits from triple vaccination, where seroconversion is associated with quantitative and qualitative changes of cellular immunity. At the same time, the study highlights that modified vaccination approaches for immunosuppressed patients still remain an urgent medical need. Significance statementProtection of solid organ transplant recipients against SARS-Cov-2 by vaccination remains an unmet need given the low immunogenicity of available vaccines in the presence of immunosuppression. Administration of a third dose to 25 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) resulted in seroconversion in 36% of patients, associated with significant quantitative and functional changes within the spike-antigen-specific B-cell- and CD4+ T-helper cell compartment. Our data support the need for individual humoral monitoring of immunosuppressed individuals after vaccination as well as continued efforts to adapt vaccination protocols for this at-risk group.

B cell numbers predict humoral and cellular response upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among patients treated with rituximab (preprint)

Objectives Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases receiving rituximab (RTX) therapy show substantially impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine humoral but partly inducible cellular immune responses. However, the complex relationship between antigen-specific B and T cells and the level of B cell repopulation necessary to achieve anti-vaccine responses remain largely unknown. Methods Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and induction of antigen-specific B and CD4/CD8 T cell subsets were studied in 19 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients receiving RTX, 12 RA patients on other therapies and 30 healthy controls after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with either mRNA or vector based vaccines. Results A minimum of 10 B cells/µL in the peripheral circulation was necessary in RTX patients to mount seroconversion to anti-S1 IgG upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RTX patients lacking IgG seroconversion showed reduced antigen-specific B cells, lower frequency of TfH-like cells as well as less activated CD4 and CD8 T cells compared to IgG seroconverted RTX patients. Functionally relevant B cell depletion resulted in impaired IFNγ secretion by spike-specific CD4 T cells. In contrast, antigen-specific CD8 T cells were reduced in patients independently of IgG formation. Conclusions Patients receiving rituximab with B cell numbers above 10 B cells/µl were able to mount humoral and more robust cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination that may permit optimization of vaccination in these patients. Mechanistically, the data emphasize the crucial role of co-stimulatory B cell functions for the proper induction of CD4 responses propagating vaccine-specific B and plasma cell differentiation.

Impaired antigen-specific memory B cell and plasma cell responses including lack of specific IgG upon SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination among Kidney Transplant and Dialysis patients (preprint)

Patients with kidney failure are at increased risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and effective vaccinations are needed. It is not known how efficient mRNA vaccines mount B and plasma cell responses in dialysis patients (DP) or kidney transplant recipients (KTR) compared to healthy controls (HC). We studied humoral and B cell responses of 25 HC, 44 DP and 40 KTR. Markedly impaired anti-BNT162b2 responses were identified among KTR and DP compared to 100% seroconversion in HC. In DP, the response was delayed (3-4 weeks after boost) and reduced with anti-S1 IgG positivity in 31 (70.5%) and anti-S1 IgA in 30 (68.2%) of 44, respectively. In contrast, KTR did not develop IgG response except one patient who had prior unrecognized infection and developed anti-S1 IgG. The majority of antigen-specific B cells (RBD+) were identified in the plasmablast or post-switch memory B cell compartments in HC, whereas these RBD+ B cells were enriched among pre-switch and naive B cells from DP and KTR. Single cell transcriptome and CITE-seq analyses found reduced frequencies of plasmablasts, TCF7+CD27+GZMK+ T cells and proliferating MKI67-expressing lymphocytes among KTR non-responders. Importantly, the frequency and absolute number of antigen-specific circulating plasmablasts in the whole cohort correlated with the Ig response, a characteristic not reported for other vaccinations. In conclusion, this data indicate that lack of T cell help related to immunosuppression results in impaired germinal center differentiation of B and plasma cell memory. There is an urgent need to improve vaccination protocols in patients after kidney transplantation or on chronic dialysis. One Sentence SummaryKidney transplant recipients and dialysis patients show a markedly diminished humoral response and impaired molecular B cell memory formation upon vaccination with BNT162b2.

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Tozinameran Vaccination in Patients on Chronic Dialysis (preprint)

ObjectivePatients with kidney failure have notoriously weak responses to common vaccines. Thus, immunogenicity of novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines might be impaired in this group. To determine immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic dialysis, we analyzed the humoral and T-cell response after two doses of mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (BNT162b2 BioNTech/Pfizer). Design, Settings, and ParticipantsThis observational study included 43 patients on dialysis before vaccination with two doses of Tozinameran 21 days apart. Overall, 36 patients completed the observation period. Serum samples were analyzed by SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies [~]1 and [~]3-4 weeks after the second vaccination. In addition, SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were assessed at the later time point by an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Outcomes at later timepoints were compared to a group of 44 elderly patients with no dialysis after immunization with Tozinameran. ExposuresBlood drawings during regular laboratory routine assessment right before start of dialysis therapy or at the time of vaccination and at follow-up study visits. Main Outcomes and MeasuresAssessment of immunogenicity after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients on and without dialysis. ResultsMedian age of patients on chronic dialysis was 74.0 years (IQR 66.0, 82.0). The proportion of males was higher (69.4%) than females. Only 20/36 patients (55.6%, 95%CI: 38.29-71.67) developed SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies at first sampling, whereas 32/36 patients (88.9%, 95%CI:73.00-96.38) demonstrated seropositivity at the second sampling. Seroconversion rates and antibody titers were significantly lower compared to a cohort of vaccinees with similar age but no chronic dialysis (>90% seropositivity). SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses 3 weeks after second vaccination were detected in 21/31 vaccinated dialysis patients (67.7%, 95%CI: 48.53-82.68) compared to 42/44 (93.3%, 95%CI: 76.49-98.84) in controls of similar age. Conclusion and RelevancePatients on dialysis demonstrate a delayed, but robust immune response three weeks after the second dose, which indicates effective vaccination of this vulnerable group. However, the lower immunogenicity of Tozinameran in these patients needs further attention to develop potential countermeasures such as an additional booster vaccination.